A platinum perpetual calendar can be more culturally important than financially smart, and the secondary market has become the one place where romance is audited; lately, that audit has been unsentimental, even when prices have stopped falling.
The scene repeats itself in Geneva, New York, Singapore: a private room, a tray, a loupe offered like a sacrament. The salesperson speaks in two languages at once—one of finishing and lineage, another of allocation, “collectability,” and the gentle implication that you are not merely buying a watch, you are joining a narrative with resale options. Then, a year later, the same piece reappears online with the lighting of an apartment kitchen and a description that sounds faintly apologetic. “Worn a few times.” “Full set.” “Priced to sell.” The contradiction is not that a magnificent object can lose money; it is that the category most invested in permanence—haut-de-gamme watchmaking—now lives under an always-on market quote.
The numbers explain the mood, but not the humiliation. The broader secondary market fell hard after the 2022 peak: Chrono24 has described a roughly 25% decline between April 2022 and October 2024, before signs of stabilization. Meanwhile, the major-brand proxies tell a less melodramatic, more exhausting story: Bloomberg reported that 2024 saw fresh multi-year lows across indexes tracking popular Rolex, Patek Philippe, and Audemars Piguet models, with the annual performance still negative for all three. By the end of 2025, WatchCharts’ overall index was up about 5% on the year—recovery, yes, but of the “a patient has stopped bleeding” variety rather than a return to peak euphoria.
So why do some high-end watches—often the ones with the most sincere artisanal effort, the most gold, the most complications—perform poorly when they hit the secondary market? Start with the simplest, least poetic answer: liquidity is not a reward for craft; it is a reward for recognizability. The pre-owned market is not an academy handing out medals for anglage. It is a crowd—large, global, anxious—buying what it can quickly price, quickly explain, and quickly resell. Steel sports watches became a kind of informal reserve currency because everyone knows the ticker. In contrast, a grand complication in precious metal is often a dissertation with lugs. It needs context, and context is expensive.
That expense grows in a market that has become more segmented, not less. Chrono24’s recent commentary points to a sharpening divide between “core luxury pieces,” enthusiast watches, and high-end independents whose value depends on production volume and perceived stability. Translation: even among informed buyers, faith is now conditional. If a brand’s after-sales service is slow, if spare parts feel like an inside joke, if the founder’s presence is the main warranty card, the buyer discounts the romance. The secondary market doesn’t hate artistry; it hates uncertainty. And uncertainty, in 2026, has its own price list.
Then there is the dirty secret of haute: much of it is designed to be admired more than worn. A complicated dress watch can be astonishing in the hand and awkward on an actual wrist attached to an actual life. Thickness, fragility, moisture paranoia, the “special occasion” logic that slowly turns into “why did I buy this?” When a watch is purchased as an idealized future self—more formal, more patient, more invited—it is especially vulnerable to resale the moment reality reasserts itself. The secondary market is where aspirational identities go to be marked down.
Macro conditions make all of this harsher, because discretionary luxury is where confidence shows up—or doesn’t. Reuters noted how external shocks (tariffs, currency pressure, softer demand) can rattle the Swiss watch industry’s outlook and sentiment. Even when a collector is personally unaffected, the collective mood tightens. Buyers become conservative, and conservatism in watches has a very specific silhouette: familiar cases, familiar brand names, models with a long history of being liquid. The result is a paradox: in risk-off moments, the market punishes “special” watches first, even though specialness is what brands have been selling at record prices.
Culturally, something else is happening: taste is moving, and not always in the direction brands predicted. The post-hype era has been described as a reset, with younger buyers tilting toward sleeker, smaller, more elegant pieces—dress watches, but often from brands with mass recognition and clear design codes (Cartier is the obvious example). That matters because it reveals what kind of “dress watch” wins now: one that reads instantly, photographs cleanly, and carries social proof across generations. A complex, hyper-niche haute dress piece can still struggle because it is neither the old status symbol nor the new cultural shorthand. It sits in the awkward middle: expensive, but not automatically legible.
And legibility is the real secondary-market moat. The best-performing watches tend to have public narratives that are simple enough to survive a casual conversation: the model name is the story. Many haut-de-gamme watches, especially those launched as limited editions with ornate themes, require the brand’s own marketing voice to make sense. Once that voice is gone—once the boutique lighting is replaced by a buyer’s phone camera—what remains is a complicated object with a complicated explanation. The market discounts complicated explanations.
There is also a supply-side irony: “limited” is no longer a reliable signal. After the boom years, collectors learned that limited editions can be numerous, sequential, or quietly repeated in new colors. Even when a watch is truly scarce, scarcity alone doesn’t guarantee a bid; it only guarantees a smaller audience. The secondary market rewards scarcity when it intersects with desire that’s already widely shared. Otherwise, scarcity becomes isolation.
What you are seeing, in other words, is the secondary market quietly reasserting an old hierarchy that the 2021–2022 mania briefly scrambled. In the boom, money chased novelty, and novelty performed like value. In the comedown, value reverted to what can be standardized: brand strength, model continuity, reliable servicing, and a thick layer of collective agreement about what something is worth. WatchCharts can show a broad index rising again, and Subdial can show choppier, uneven movement underneath; both can be true because the “market” is now a patchwork of micro-markets.
The lesson is not that haute horlogerie is failing. It is that haute, by design, often resists the very features that make resale strong: standardization, instant recognition, and low perceived risk. Some watches are built to be kept, not traded; the market merely insists on pricing that philosophy. In the end, the secondary market is not judging whether a watch is great—it is judging whether other people will agree with you quickly enough to matter.
About the Author
Sergio Galanti is an independent brand strategist and writer in the luxury watch industry. He is the editor of WatchDossier, a publication devoted to the cultural and philosophical undercurrents of modern horology.
No compensation or brand affiliation influenced this essay. Opinions are the author’s own.
Subscribe watchdossier.ch to receive more insights on luxury, craftsmanship, and collecting.